AASHTO M 145 1991. Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate
AASHTO M 145 1991. Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes
Ahmadi M.M. E Robertson P.K. 2005. Thin layer effects on the CPT qc measurement. Can. Geotech. J., 42, 1302-1317.
Alsamman O.M. (1995) The use of CPT for calculating the axial capacity of drilled shafts. Ph. D. Thesis UIUC IL, 128 – 174.
Amorosi A. and Marchi N. 1999. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy from piezocone tests: an example from the Late Quaternary deposits of the southeastern Po Plain Sedimentary Geology 128, 67–81.
ASTM. 2000. Standard test method for performing electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. ASTM standard D5778–95. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Baldi, G., Bellotti, R., Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M. & Pasqualini, E. 1986. Interpretation of CPT's and CPTU's. 2nd Part: Drained Penetration. Proceeding 4th International Geotechnical Seminar, Singapore, pp.143-156
Baldi, G., D. Bruzzi, S. Superbo, M. Battaglio, and Jamiolkowski M. 1988. Seismic Cone in Po River Sand. Penetration Testing 1988, Vol. 2 (Proc. ISOPT-1, Orlando, Fla.), Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 643–650.
Begemann, H. K. S. 1965. The Friction Jacket Cone as an Aid in Determining the Soil Profile, Proc. 6th ICSMFE, 1, 17-20.
Cai G., Liu S., Puppala A. J. 2011. Comparison of CPT charts for soil classification using PCPT data: Example from clay deposits in Jiangsu Province, China. Engineering Geology 121, 89–96.
Campanella, R.G. and Robertson P.K. 1988. Current Status of the Piezocone Test. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Penetration Testing, Vol. 1, Orlando, Fla. (Penetration Testing 1988), Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Mar. 20–24, 93–116.
Campanella, R.G., Robertson P.K., and Gillespie D. 1986. Seismic Cone Penetration Test,” Use of In-Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering (GSP 6), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., pp. 116–130.
Canadian Geotechnical Society. 1985. Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. Part 1 Fundamentals, Canadian Geotechnical Society, BiTech Publishers, Vancouver, BC, 456 p.
Carelli I. 2009. Metodi di controllo tradizionali ed innovativi di costruzioni in materiali sciolti. B. Thesis - Department of Civil Engineering - University of Pisa. In Italian.
Cestari F., Prove geotecniche in sito. Ed. Geo-graph s.n.c, Segrate, 1990.
Chen, B.S.-Y. and Mayne P.W. 1994. Profiling the Overconsolidation Ratio of Clays by Piezocone Tests, Report No. GIT-CEEGEO-94-1 to National Science Foundation by Geosystems Engineering Group, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 1994, 280 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.ce.gatech.edu/~geosys/Faculty/Mayne/papers/index.html.
De Beer E. E. (1985) Belgian Jubilee Volume, XI ICSMFE, S. Francisco
deRuiter, J., “Electric Penetrometer for Site Investigations,”Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Vol. 97, No. SM2, 1971, pp. 457–472.
Douglas, J. B. and Olsen R. S. 1981. Soil Classification using Electric Cone Penetrometer. Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, St. Louis, pp. 209-227.
Elmgren, K. 1995. Slot-Type Pore Pressure CPTu Filters. Proceedings, International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Vol. 2, Swedish Geotechnical Society Report 3:95, Oct. 4–5, 1995, Linköping, The Netherlands, pp. 9–12.
Eslami A., Fellenius B.H. 1997. Pile capacity by direst CPT and CPTU methods applied to 102 case histories. Can. Geotech. J., 34, 886-904.
Fellenius H.B., Eslami A. 2000. Soil Profile Interpreted from CPTu Data. “Year 2000 Geotechnics”, Geotechnical Engineering Conference, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.
Garizio G.M. 1997. Determinazione dei parametri geotecnici e in particolare di K0 da prove penetrometriche M.Sc. Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Torino. In Italian.
Ghionna, V.N. and D. Porcino. 2006. Liquefaction Resistance of Undisturbed and Reconstituted Samples of a Natural Coarse Sand from Undrained Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132, 2, 194–202.
ISO 22476-1. 2005. Geotechnical investigation and testing. Field testing, part 1: Electrical cone and piezocone penetration tests.
ISO 22476-12. 2009. Geotechnical investigation and testing. Field testing, part 12: Mechanical cone penetration test.
Jaeger R.A., DeJong J.T., Boulanger R.W., Low H.E., Randolph M.F. 2010. Variable penetration rate CPT in an intermediate soil. CPT’10, 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, May 9-11 2010, Huntington Beach, California.
Jamiolkowski M., Ghionna V.N., Lancellotta R. & Pasqualini E. 1988. New correlations of penetration tests for design practice. Proc., Penetration Testing 1988, ISOPT 1, Orlando, Florida, J. De Ruiter ed., Vol. 1 pp: 263-296
Jamiolkowski M., Lo Presti D.C.F. & Garizio G.M. 2000. Correlation between Relative Density and Cone Resistance for Silica Sands. 75th Anniversary of Karl Terzagni’s ERDBAU
Jamiolkowski M., Lo Presti D.C.F. & Manassero M. 2001. Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from CPT and DMT, Invited Lecture Ladd Symposium, GSP No. 119, ASCE, pp. 201-238.
Jamiolkowski, M., C.C. Ladd, J.T. Germaine, and Lancellotta R. 1985. New Developments in Field and Lab Testing of Soils. Proceedings, 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, San Francisco, Calif., Aug. 12–16, 1985, pp. 57–154.
Jamiolkowski, M., D.C.F. LoPresti, and Manassero M. 2001. Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from Cone Penetration Test and Flat Dilatometer Test,” Soil Behavior and Soft Ground Construction (GSP 119), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., pp. 201–238.
Jefferies M.G. and Davies M.P. 1993. Use of CPTU to estimate equivalent SPT N60. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 16, 458-468.
Jung B.C., Gardoni P., Biscontin G. 2008. Probabilistic soil identification based on cone penetration tests. Géotechnique, 58, 591-603.
Keaveny, J.M. and Mitchell J.K. 1986. Strength of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Piezocone. Use of In-Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering (GSP 6), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., pp. 668–699.
Konrad, J.-M. and Law K.T. 1987. Undrained Shear Strength from Piezocone Tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 24, 3, 392–405.
Kulhawy, F.H. and Mayne P.W. 1990. Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design, Report EPRI EL-6800, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., 306 pp.
Kurup, U. & Griffin, E.P. 2006. Prediction of soil composition from CPT data using general regression neural network. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 20, 281-289.
Ladd, C.C.. 1991. Stability Evaluation During Staged Construction,” The 22nd Terzaghi Lecture, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117, 4, 540–615.
Lafuerza S., Canals M., Casamor a J.L., Devincenzi J.M. 2005. Characterization of deltaic sediment bodies based on in situ CPT/CPTU profiles: A case study on the Llobregat delta plain, Barcelona, Spain. Marine Geology , 222–223, 497–510.
Larsson, R. 1995. Use of a Thin Slot as Filter in Piezocone Tests. Proceedings, International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Vol. 2, Swedish Geotechnical Society Report 3:95, Oct. 4–5, 1995, Linköping, Sweden, pp. 35–40.
Lee, J.H. and R. Salgado. 1999. Determination of Pile Base Resistance in Sands,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125, 8, 673–683.
Leroueil, S. and D. Hight. 2003. Behavior and Properties of Natural Soils and Soft Rocks. Characterization and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, Vol. 1, Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands, pp. 29–254.
Lo Presti D, Squeglia N., Meisina C. & Visconti L. 2010 Use of CPT and CPTu for soil profiling of "intermediate soils": a new approach. CPT’10, 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, May 9-11 2010, Huntington Beach, California.
Lo Presti, D., Meisina, C., Squeglia, N. 2009. Use of cone penetration tests for soil profiling. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica, 2, 9-33.
Lunne T., Robertson P.K., and Powell J.J.M. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. Blackie Academic, EF Spon Routledge Publ., New York, 312 pp.
Lunne, T., M. Long, and Forsberg C.F. 2003. Characterization and Engineering Properties of Holmen, Drammen Sand,” Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, Vol. 2 (Proc. Singapore), Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands, pp. 1121–1148.
Lunne, T., T. Eidsmoen, D. Gillespie, and Howland J.D. 1986. Laboratory and Field Evaluation of Cone Penetrometers. Use of In-Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering (GSP 6), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 1986, pp. 714–729.
Maine, P. W., Kulhawy, F. H. 1991. Calibration chamber database and boundary effects correction for CPT data. In Calibration chamber Testing. New York: Elsevier, pp. 257-264.
Mayne, P.W. 2007.Cone penetration testing: A synthesis of highway practice. Project 20-5. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. NCHRP synthesis 368.
Mayne, P.W., F.H. Kulhawy, and Kay J.N. 1990. Observations on the Development of Porewater Pressures During Piezocone Testing in Clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27, 4, 418–428.
Meyerhof G.G. (1976) Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations, JGED, ASCE, GT3, 197 - 228
Mimura, M. 2003. Characteristics of Some Japanese Natural Sands—Data from Undisturbed Frozen Samples,” Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, 94 Vol. 2 (Proc. Singapore), Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands, pp. 1149–1168.
Mulabdic´, M., S. Eskilson, and Larsson R. 1990. Calibration of Piezocones for Investigations in Soft Soils and Demands for Accuracy of the Equipment. Report Varia 270, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Sweden, 1990, 62 pp.
Pagani Geotechnical Equipment. 2009. http://www.pagani-geotechnical.com.
Principe C. Malfatti A., Rosi M., Ambrosio M. Fagioli M.T. 1997. Metodologia innovativa di carotaggio microstratigrafico: esempio di applicazione alla tefrostratigrafia di prodotti vulcanici distali. Geologia Tecnica Ambientale Vol 39, 4/97. In Italian.
Principe C., Malfatti A.,. Ambrosio M., Fagioli M.T., Rosi M.,. Ceccanti B., Arrighi S., Innamorati D. 2007. Finding distal Vesuvius tephra at the borders of Lago Grande di Monticchio, in AF SHALLOW CORING SYSTEM micro-cores. Atti Soc. tosc. Sci. nat., Mem., Serie A, 112 (2007). pagg. 189-197, figg. 4, tabb. 4
Ramsey N. 2010. Some issues related to applications of the CPT. CPT’10, 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, May 9-11 2010, Huntington Beach, California.
Robertson P. K., Campanella R. G., Gillespie D., Grieg J. 1986. Use of Piezometer Cone Data. Proceedings of American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, “In Situ 86: Specialty Conference”, edited by S. Clemence, Blacksburg, June 23 – 25, Geotechnical Special Publication GSP No. 6, pp. 1263-1280.
Robertson P.K. 1990. Soil Classification Using the Cone Penetration Test. Can. Geotech. J., vol. 27, pp. 151-158.
Robertson P.K. 2010. Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update. CPT’10, 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, May 9-11 2010, Huntington Beach, California.
Robertson, P.K. 2009. Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach. Can. Geotech. J. 46, 11, 1337-1355.
Robertson, P.K. and Campanella R.G. 1983. Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests: Sands. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20, 4, 719–733.
Schmertmann J.H., Hartman J.D. and Brown P.R. (1978) Improved strain influence factor diagrams, JGED, ASCE, Technical Note, 104, GT8, 1131 – 1135.
Schmertmann, J.H., 1978. Guidelines for Cone Penetration Test, Performance and Design. Report No. FHWA-TS-78-209, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., pp. 145, 1978.
Searle, I.W. 1979. The interpretation of Begemann Friction Jacket Cone Results to Give Soil Types and Design Parameters. Design Parameters in Geotechnical Engineering, BCS London 2: 265-270.
Sennest K., Sandven R., Jambu N. 1989. Evaluation of Soil parameters from piezocone test. In – Situ Testing of Soil Properties for Transportation, Transportation Research Record No. 1235, Washington D.C., pp. 24 – 37.
Setra – Lcpc. 1994. Remblelayage des tranchées et réfection des chaussées – Guide Technique. Setra/LCPC, réf. D9441
Setra – Lcpc. 2007. Remblelayage des tranchées et réfection des chaussées – Compléments. Setra/LCPC, no. 117
Squeglia N., Lo Presti D. C. 2010. Use of mini CPT to evaluate degree of compaction in fine grained soils, 1st Europe-China Workshop on Capability of Penetration Tests in geotechnical Research and Practice, pp 65-72, Pisa,vol. 1,2010.
Tanizawa F. 1992. Correlations between cone resistance and mechanical properties of uniform clean sand, Internal Report ENEL – CRIS, Milan.
Trak, B., P. LaRochelle, F. Tavenas, S. Leroueil, and M. Roy. 1980. A New Approach to the Stability Analysis of Embankments on Sensitive Clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 17, 4, 526–544.
Vreugdenhil R., Davis R., Berril J. 1994. Interpretation of cone penetration results in multilayered soils. International Journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, vol. 18, pp. 585-599.
Vuodo C. 2009. Uso delle prove CPT per il controllo della qualità dei rilevati B. Thesis - Department of Civil Engineering - University of Pisa. In Italian.
Wride, C.E. and Robertson P.K. 1999. CANLEX: The Canadian Liquefaction Experiment: Data Review Report (Five Volumes), BiTech Publishers Ltd., Richmond, BC, Canada, 1,081 pp.
Wride, C.E., Robertson, P.K., Biggar, K.W., Campanella, R.G., Hofmann, B.A., Hughes, J.M.O., Ku¨pper, A., and Woeller, D.J. 2000. Interpretation of in situ test results from the CANLEX sites. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(3): 505–529. doi:10.1139/T00-044.
XP P 94-063. 1997. Controle de la qualité du compactage-methode au penetrometre dynamique a energie constante. AFNOR
XP P 94-105. 2000. Controle de la qualité du compactage-methode au penetrometre dynamique a energie variable. AFNOR
Zhang, Z. & Tumay, M.T. 1999. Statistical to fuzzy approach toward CPT soil classification. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125, 179-186.